Joint and Common Costs |
|
Arizona
- An examination of TSLRIC modeling and joint and common costs, and the extent to which basic local telephone service is subsidized
by other services. View or Download
a PDF copy of this testimony.
|
|
Colorado
- An outline of the relationship between basic local service, toll service, access lines, and the joint and common costs of providing these services.
View or Download
a PDF copy of this testimony.
|
|
Delaware
- A discussion of the recovery of joint and common costs through UNE rates.
View or Download
a PDF copy of this testimony.
|
|
Indiana
- A discussion of the Commission's rulings regarding the treatment of joint and common costs and a critique of the recovery method used by GTE in its cost studies.
View or Download
a PDF copy of this testimony.
|
|
Kansas
- An introduction to various revenue-based and usage-based (SPF and SLU) allocation methods for joint and common costs.
View or Download
a PDF copy of this testimony.
|
|
Ohio
- A discussion of the Commission's rulings regarding the treatment of joint and common costs and a critique of the recovery method used by Cincinnati Bell in its cost studies.
View or Download
a PDF copy of this testimony.
|
|
Ohio
- A detailed analysis of the regulatory treatment of the joint and common cost issue by the Ohio Commission, other state Commissions, and the FCC.
View or Download
a PDF copy of this testimony.
|
|
Ohio
- A critique of the "cost causation" argument commonly used to support the allocation of 100% of joint and common costs to basic local service.
View or Download
a PDF copy of this testimony.
|
